#1
Introduction
00:35
#2
Could you elaborate on how these French and international judicial proceedings’ experiences honed your quest for law practice learning?
02:12
#3
Were your practices and training in human rights, biomedicine, and sexual and cyber violence, part of your inspirations to start research?
03:54
#4
What led you to analysing health related AI systems?
05:56
#5
How did you choose the subjects of health practitioners and AI physical appearance discrimination?
07:58
#6
Could you please illustrate the technicological occurrence of AI biases based on appearance discrimination?
10:21
#7
Are there any technological ways to prevent these biaes?
13:44
#8
Could you please elaborate on the remote sensors you studied and how they work?
14:51
#9
What technical mistakes exist and how do they impact patients?
17:13
#10
What is your feeling on the legal context Ai law reseachers are currently in?
20:38
#11
Do you think the risk of these discriminatory biases is known to concerned individuals and adequately approached by lawmakers?
22:58
#12
What concrete legal measures exist to avoid this discrimination?
25:36
#13
In your opinion, what are the main shortcomings of existing standards in regulating discriminatory biases?
28:59
#14
How did you establish a link between this French law and the health professional’s liability?
31:41
#15
French law recognises several harms, in the case of the harm suffered by patients in medical sensors, how easy is it to apprehend by Law?
37:26
#16
What key advice would you give to women exploring the world of AI and law?
39:04
Episode 4: In discussion with Marie Geny - Health Sensors Under the M(A)icroscope
Background and Research Interests (00:00 - 10:20)
IT Perspectives - Understanding the legal consequences (10:21 - 20:37)
Legal Perspectives (20:38 - 31:40)
On health censors and health liabilities (31:41 - 39:03)
Signature questions (39:04 - 40:00)
Hosted on Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.
Powered by Ausha 🚀