Safer Chemicals Podcast

Assessing EU's chemicals legislation: more needs to be done to make chemicals safe and sustainable

00:00 / 23:56

•

Chapters

Introduction of the guests and topics of the podcast

00:40

What do the EEA and ECHA agencies do?

01:15

How did the two agencies unite their forces to collaborate in this project and also others similar?

02:59

Why do we need the indicators?

05:46

What are the specific parameters that are being considered within this framework?

07:14

How will these indicators help to monitor the impacts of chemical policy in Europe?

08:25

How does the collaborative process take place between the various agencies and institutions into establishing the indicators?

09:51

What are the key messages that have emerged from the EEA and ECHA's point of view on this project?

11:14

What are ECHA's prospective on the project?

13:34

#10

How do the EEA and ECHA vision the indicators in contributing to the industrial transition and towards the production of safer chemicals?

15:20

#11

What kind of challenges have the two agencies encountered during the development of the framework and how are they being addressed?

16:22

#12

How will the framework ensure the transparency of information and make it available to all stakeholders and the public?

17:53

#13

Who do the two agencies see using the framework of indicators?

18:45

#14

What are the next steps for this project?

20:34

Assessing EU's chemicals legislation: more needs to be done to make chemicals safe and sustainable

Published on April 15, 2024

•Safer Chemicals Podcast

Welcome to this episode of the Safer Chemicals Podcast, where we look into the EU indicator framework for chemicals, focused on improving chemical safety across Europe.

The transition towards safer and more sustainable chemicals is progressing in some areas, while in others, it is just beginning. This is the finding of a first, joint Europe-wide assessment of the drivers and impact of chemical pollution by the European Environment Agency (EEA) and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). The benchmarking found that more work is still needed to reduce the impact of harmful substances on human health and the environment. 

We are joined by Leena Ylä-Mononen, the Executive Director of EEA and Sharon McGuinness, the Executive Director of ECHA. Together, they discuss the roles their agencies play in developing these indicators. This episode offers an in-depth look at how these agencies work together to support safer chemical management, highlighting the real-world impact of their work on environmental and public health.

We'll explore the challenges faced during the project, the collaboration between various European institutions, and what future developments we might expect in the realm of chemical safety.

Background

According to the joint EEA-ECHA synthesis report on the EU indicator framework for chemicals, the overall use of the most harmful chemicals (in particular those that are carcinogenic, mutagenic and reprotoxic) is still growing but more slowly than the overall chemicals market growth. Pressure is increasing to avoid the use of so-called substances of concern and to implement the principles of the safe and sustainable by design framework. 

There is a need to more effectively ensure that consumer products do not contain the most harmful substances, for example chemicals that are endocrine disrupting, that negatively affect the hormone system, or substances that are persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic, which present a risk for years to come even after their use has ceased.

More data and information are needed to better understand human and environmental exposure to those most harmful chemicals and their impacts. Still, the indicators show clearly that the shift to safe and sustainable chemicals must continue and should even be accelerated.

Listen to our episode for a deep dive into what the main findings of this initial assessment were and check the online dashboard for more details.

Useful links

**************

Visit our website

Disclaimer: Views expressed by interviewees do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Chemicals Agency. All content is up to date at the time of publication.

Hosted by Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.

🚀 Powered by Ausha

Share episode

Season 4,

16 episodes

Assessing EU's chemicals legislation: more needs to be done to make chemicals safe and sustainable

24 min left

PFAS restriction sectoral approach: Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis Committee highlights

18:51

Joining forces for humans, animals, environment: One Health - Part 2

21:08

Joining forces for humans, animals, environment: One Health - Part 1

23:10

EU enforcement project: excessive levels of harmful chemicals found in consumer products

20:01

Unpacking 5 600 comments on PFAS restriction: Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis Committee highlights

19:17

Biocidal Products Committee: Data gaps slowing down substance approvals and product authorisations

12:41

Bridging the gap between scientific research and chemicals regulation

28:56

Banning creosote-treated wood: Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis Committee highlights

30:34

Biocidal Products Committee: New Chair's outlook on future challenges

17:28

ECHA's committees in focus: Tim Bowmer reflects on 11 years as Chair, PFAS restrictions, and future outlook

36:42

Enforcement Forum's impact and future: insights from the Forum's outgoing Chair

16:27

Biocidal Products Committee: reflecting on ten years of committee work

27:09

Risk Assessment Committee backs PFAS ban in firefighting foams

25:27

Biocidal Products Committee: Nitrogen generated from ambient air as a low-risk active substance

21:12

EU enforcement project: full compliance with EU chemicals law needed

31:05

Season 3,

15 episodes

What we know about (bio)degradation and safety by design of nanomaterials

32:19

Limiting lead use for outdoor shooting and fishing: Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis Committees

32:10

Biocidal Products Committee: Rodent traps can be effective at controlling house mice infestations

31:26

EU enforcement project to focus on imported products: Enforcement Forum November highlights

18:19

Biocidal Products Committee: Sulphur dioxide, iodine & anticoagulant rodenticides

31:55

Cancer-causing PAHs in clay targets need an EU-wide ban: Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis Committees' highlights

29:13

OECD – 50 years of improving chemical safety worldwide

28:44

Record number of opinions adopted in June meeting of the Biocidal Products Committee

30:24

EU projects and transparency: Enforcement Forum June meeting highlights

25:18

Group assessment identifies need to restrict more than 30 bisphenols

24:18

Glyphosate, lead and silver: Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis Committees Highlights - June 2022

38:58

EU Green Deal: paving the way for greener and safer chemicals

34:28

Highlights from the March 2022 Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis committees

36:55

Highlights from the March 2022 Biocidal Products Committee

31:36

Protecting our drinking water and food – EU restriction of PFAS in firefighting foams

13:56

Season 2,

13 episodes

Highlights from the December 2021 Biocidal Products Committee

31:12

Most inspected products sold online do not comply with EU chemicals law

23:32

Assessing chemicals in groups: faster action on harmful chemicals

18:30

Making tattoos and permanent make-up safer

22:25

Nanomaterials in EU waste streams

17:40

Highlights from the October Biocidal Products Committee

30:36

SCIP: transparency on hazardous chemicals in products

13:26

Restriction of lead in outdoor shooting: David Scallan, European Federation for Hunting and Conservation (FACE)

12:47

Restriction of lead in outdoor shooting: Hans Steinkellner, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

07:11

Restriction of lead in outdoor shooting: Philip Taylor, ELEY Limited

04:47

Restriction of lead in outdoor shooting: Niels Kastrup, Danish Hunting Academy

07:18

Restriction of lead in outdoor shooting: Nina Mikander, UN Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Water Birds (AEWA)

11:30

Restriction of lead in outdoor shooting: Ruth Cromie Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust (WWT)

07:45

Season 1,

4 episodes

EU checks imported products for dangerous chemicals

23:30

Restricting microplastics and PFHxS in the EU

12:16

How is the EU making sure PFAS chemicals don’t stick around?

20:21

Do nappies for infants contain harmful chemicals?

09:26

Safer Chemicals Podcast

Assessing EU's chemicals legislation: more needs to be done to make chemicals safe and sustainable

Chapters

Share episode

Subscribe

Season 4,

Season 3,

Season 2,

Season 1,